Miles 2 Go

Miles 2 Go

A forum for reflecting on all matters related to life and living

Menu
  • Home
  • My Bookshelf
  • Issues
  • Musings
  • Religion, Spirituality, Faith
Menu

Religion, Spirituality, Faith

Darrell and Barbara – an encounter with fellowship

Posted on April 15, 2026April 26, 2026 by admin

In A ‘problem’ with “Ask Jesus into your heart,” I introduced ‘differentiation’ and ‘integration’ to describe how individuals and organizations work to create their identify. They outline differences to distinguish themselves from others (differentiation) or similarities to show avenues of potential alignment (integration). I shared how Indigenous students in a conservative evangelical college exemplified these two approaches to the question of how Indigenous and Christian beliefs and practices should relate to each other.

Integration is less rigid than differentiation (has fewer ‘final answers’) and casts a wider net for information before making decisions. While differentiation is bound by rules and preconceived notions, integration looks for patterns of meaning from a diversity of inputs. It isn’t an either-or, black or white, dualistic mindset. A powerful example of this tension in evangelicalism has been the issue of guidance and the will of God.

Older conservative evangelicals may remember Garry Friesen’s Decision Making and the Will of God: A Biblical Alternative to the Traditional View (1984). It was a welcome breath of fresh air to some Christians. Outright heresy to others. He challenged the traditional evangelical default view of God’s method for providing guidance: that we must look for a precise, specific will of God, a bullseye, when making decisions (i.e., differentiation).

Friesen offered what he called the wisdom view. It was more permissive in that it encouraged exploring a range of options before making decisions (i.e, integration). It even allowed for the possibility that a young man or woman could have more than one potential life partner out there.

In other words, Friesen’s wisdom view was integrative. It assumed a processing of relationships between relevant variables before making a decision. Whereas differentiation would look for the target’s bullseye, the precise, single answer that would distinguish it from everything else. The differentiated approach definitely attributes more credit to God for decisions. But it also risks leaving the human mind and rational analysis in the margins.

Ironically, the challenge of differentiation or integration in pursuing the will of God is quite relevant to the concurrent problem of determining the relationship between Indigenous and Christian beliefs and practices.

A personal experience of fellowship.

I introduced this experience at the end of A ‘problem’ with . . .’.

Walking on a sandy beach, I heard a light drum beat and saw a man and woman standing on the shore. As I approached them, he stopped drumming and even shifted to hold the small round drum behind his back. It seemed an act of humility to show no offence to me. Respectfully, I asked what they were doing. Darrell and Barbara are an Indigenous couple, ‘people of the water’ from an oceanside reservation* in northern Washington state. They were having evening prayers as the incoming tide once again revealed the rhythms of Creation. I am glad I went for that walk and felt the freedom to approach them. Our time together became an act of fellowship, prayer, and worship.
[*Note – in the U.S.A., native lands are still called ‘reservations’]

Darrell is 62 and Barbara 56. He works in an Indigenous healing center but is transitioning to start a whale-watching business off the northwest coast of Washington state. I asked Darrell to explain how they went about their prayers.

The format was something I had never heard or seen before. There are four parts to the prayers and you stand facing each of the four directions as you move through each part.

First, to the North, you speak to the Creator. Then, to the East, you address Big Brother (Jesus). Facing South, his people address the Spirit of the waters (since they are people of the water). And to the West, you address the ancestors, especially those who have died on the waters. Darrell and Barb had a pinch of herbs in their hands and gave me some to hold as well.

For each of the four directions, Darrell prayed conversationally about everything that any


Christian prayer might include: family, health, work, school, relationships, guidance in life. He expressed thanksgiving for blessings, for provisions from the land, for all creatures of the sky, sea, and earth. I tracked with them as we shifted to each of the four points of the compass. When done, we scattered our herbs to the wind.

Darrell shared some of his spiritual journey. When he enrolled in the U. S. armed forces as a young man, he didn’t know what to put down for his religious affiliation so he said Protestant. Later, he realized that his upbringing was in the Pentecostal church culture. After Army service, Darrell was drawn to Indigenous practices of worship as a fuller expression for everything he wanted spiritually. There was no angst or negativity attached to the personal narrative he shared with me. It was a testimony of how he was actively integrating all experience into a faith and practice that provides him a foundation for life.

Darrell jolted me with another new insight. He talked about praying for the animals and birds as if they are family. When you look at them and ask yourself if they were able to feed their young today, it affects how you pray. Even the ones who poop on your car. You view them in a different way. There was an appealing intensity to the awareness Darrell had for his relationship to nature, an awareness that wasn’t an active concern during much of my religious life.

Never too old to learn.

Our children attended an elementary Open School context with compulsory parental involvement. I risked being a chaperone on a wilderness field trip, something that was definitely not in my wheelhouse of comfort. During a picnic lunch stop, I was accosted by a parent. I’d like to say ‘approached’ but he really was quite aggressive. He knew enough about my background to hit me with something that was obviously a problem to him.

“You Christians take Genesis 1.26-28 and think you have dominion over the earth to pillage and destroy it without regard for . . ..” I had no defence. I didn’t have a philosophy of creation care or a manual of stewardship practice. It took my kids in that open school setting to teach me to stop using styrofoam cups. I still shudder every time I see one. We used to say that you could always tell what parents were on their way to an Open School meeting. They had ceramic cups hanging from their belts.

That parent had every right to be upset about what people had done (and were still doing) to the earth often in the name of God or his supposed purposes.

So, what am I trying to do with this narrative?

I was impressed with Darrell’s humility. He was down-to-earth and tuned in to Creation and Creator in his entire persona. Is it okay if I say I experienced spiritual fellowship with Darrell and Barb on the beach that day? That, as we faced the four points of Earth, I had a stronger sense of connection to the God of Creation, the Christ of salvation (in my worldview), and the Spirit of life. I even had some renewed thoughts about those precious relatives and friends who have gone on before me.

I did not approach my interaction with an Indigenous couple to see how much we differ from each other. Instead, I found myself flowing naturally, and spiritually, into a stronger sense of how much we might hold in common.

I don’t know enough about smudges, sweetgrass or sweat lodges to render any opinions on those elements. I do know that, as an alter boy in the Ukrainian Greek Orthodox Church, I followed the priest in circles around the altar as he shook the chains of his censer to disperse the smoking incense. Its purpose was to symbolize prayers rising to heaven. But many attendees also believed the rattling chains was to get the attention of evil spirits and the smoke was to dispel them from harming the people. This was in a Christian church.

Differentiation and integration. An ongoing process of discovery.

I am glad I went for my walk on the beach that afternoon. The time spent with Darrell and Barbara turned out to be a significant jenga block in my journey of integration and differentiation.

Ah, another metaphor. Stay tuned for a piece on The Jenga blocks of life.

A ‘problem’ with “Ask Jesus into your heart”

Posted on April 8, 2026April 14, 2026 by admin

I am 100% Ukrainian on both sides of my parental lineage. Raised in the Ukrainian Greek Orthodox Church and steeped in Ukrainian culture. It was a strong local church community with a large extended family network through heritage and marriage.

From the cradle to the grave.
Baptism of babies had symbolic rites including ‘adoption’ by godparents.


Children attended weekly Ukrainian language lessons taught by the priest. Teenagers learned Ukrainian dancing in the church hall. All of us went through formal catechism. I even became an altar boy who assisted the priest during worship services. In early rural times, weddings lasted a whole week with elaborate rituals. Funeral wakes went for days with the body in the house then removed through a window so the spirit couldn’t find its way back into the house after burial.

Why do I share all these details?
To show that our church culture was intentional in how it did its business and nurtured the next generation. We knew why we were doing the things we did. It was to preserve our heritage, our language, our culture, our Orthodox traditions. To nurture our distinctive elements with strength and godly pride.

Then, when 10 or 11 years old, I went to a Salvation Army summer camp. A major focus was to encourage campers to “accept Jesus into your heart.” Something we never did formally in the Orthodox church. The camp setting made it an easy thing to do. I was preoccupied with selling oranges and chocolate bars at great profit (my parents owned a grocery store). But, by end of week, I did ask Jesus into my heart.

So, what’s the problem?
No problem, really. Just no connection. No organizing context for meaningful followup. I returned home and continued my role as an altar boy, learning the Ukrainian language, and Ukrainian dancing. Not until years later, when 18, did a more dramatic evangelical conversion experience lead me into a fuller context for followup.

An interesting contrast. When I did ask Jesus into my heart, there was no change in my life. I really didn’t understand what I was doing. Yet in my later benchmark moment of giving myself to a Jesus faith-life, I didn’t actually say the words. But there was a depth of connection, a handshake at spirit/Spirit level, that transformed my life. And changed the trajectory of my future. At that point in time, I did know what I was doing (at least spiritually).

I never did like the phrase “Ask Jesus into your heart.”
That’s how I felt during the years of my participation in conservative evangelical culture. It always seemed so simplistic to me. So inadequate. So confusing. Using a metaphor with children without them really knowing what it means. For example, a child was having bedtime prayers with their parent. “Mom, I’m not feeling very well. Can we ask Jesus to move from my heart to my stomach?” If that conversation actually occurred, it would have been a prime opportunity for the parent to demythologize the “Jesus in my heart” syndrome.

Oops! I have just used the word that evangelicals tossed in the face of the United Church in the 1960s when it revised Sunday school curriculum to ‘demythologize’ Bible stories taught to children. Evangelicals were aghast and horrified at the thought of ‘demythologizing.’ Yet we carried on with asking Jesus into our heart.

Do I sound bitter or angry or jaundiced?
I hope not. I am none of those. But I am serious about honesty in how these things happen in church life. Conservatives don’t want metaphor, myth, or archetype. But they use them all the time for explaining things, for understanding non-tangible spiritual truths, for personalizing the faith. Liberals don’t want ‘simplistic’ language. So they try to be overly comprehensive in the breadth of their expressions. A common statement in United Church literature is “We take the Bible seriously but not literally.” So it can become ‘open house’ on what you do with it. Anything goes.

At least some of the so-called differences between religious groups are rooted in the diverse use of language. Using different words, sometimes to explain similar things. Kind of like the 1960s cigarette ad, “I’d rather fight than switch.” Billboards featured smokers with black eyes to demonstrate their loyalty to the charcoal filter of the Tareyton cigarette. Did anyone ever stop to say, “A cigarette is still a cigarette? They all cause cancer.”

Let’s throw in two more words. Quite concrete. Not metaphor. ‘Integration’ and ‘differentiation.’

The ‘battle’ between demythologizing (liberal) and personalizing (conservative) Christianity is based in attempts to differentiate ourselves, our group, from someone else. To show how we are different. And a more subtle agenda often behind such activity is to elevate ourselves as being closer to THE truth than the other guy.

There is an alternative to the conflict that arises from such perceived differences. Can we pull back the veil of language to see what it is that we are actually trying to describe? Is it possible there may be similarities of intent? Are we so fixated on the language that we are blind to the basic premises behind the language? In some ways, that’s what the ecumenical movement in the church world is all about. To try to stimulate simple conversations about things we have greatly over-complicated.

Let me share a specific example of the challenge between differentiation and integration. It involves attitudes towards if and how native/aboriginal/Indigenous religion/culture can be integrated with Christianity.

A conservative evangelical college had a Native Ministries training program for developing church leaders. Students came from diverse Indigenous contexts across Canada. Debate (and emotions) ran high amongst students on whether or not to recognize and integrate Indigenous practices into Christian life and worship. For some, it was totally irreconcilable to the point of even labeling such practices as “of the Devil.” As Christians, they were ‘delivered’ from such activity. Differentiation at its most extreme. To others, there was beautiful potential for some integration. So much symbolic value in some of the Indigenous practices. Remember, all of these students were Indigenous Bible-believing, card-carrying evangelical Christians. It made for exciting classroom sessions.

It is common to assume that what is good for us is also good for the other guy.
And, if we have the power to push it (as male-dominated structures have demonstrated), we invoke our lens of truth on those around us. It reminds me of a news report about Liechtenstein in 1984. It was the last European country to grant women the right to vote. A television crew asked a man standing on a hillside what he thought of the resolution to grant women the vote. He replied, “I’m against it.” You could see his wife a bit further down the hill working in the field. The interviewer asked the man what his wife thought of the resolution. He replied, “I haven’t asked her, but she’s against it too.” Need I say more?

There was a television program that eventually asked contestants, “Is that your final answer?” For those who major in differentiation, it is all too often their final answer. Not only in religion but also politics, childrearing, vaccinations, just about any aspect of life.

How much more attractive to me is another example. One that demonstrates the desire to be open to new learning, to allow for an expanded awareness of truth.

A conservative church congregation went through extended study (including many arguments) on a divisive issue. Participating in the process were two men, both longtime members in the local church and strong opponents to the resolution for a change in policy. One went home after the first town hall meeting and never returned. I speculate he viewed the church as ‘going to hell in a hand basket’ just for talking about the possibility of change. His ‘final answer.’ The second man, after the congregation voted to affirm the resolution, came to the pastor. He said, “I still disagree with the result but this is our church, we aren’t going anywhere else, and I will support the decision.”

Which man do you think demonstrated a humble spirit, a willingness to learn, an openness to expand his awareness of truth? To ‘lay down’ self and allow for integration in the name of unity.

So, there is nothing wrong with asking Jesus into your heart. If that is your church context. But you should know that, in the conservative evangelical culture, Jesus doesn’t want just your heart. He wants all of you. Your head, your hands, your feet. In fact, there may be less evangelical scandals if leaders moved Jesus from their heart to their head.

Do you see the language I’m using here? It’s consistent with the semantic (you’ll have to look it up) orientation of the evangelical group. Again, no problem. The problem starts when there is no instructional followup to explain what you mean. Or when you use that language with other people who aren’t aligned with your group. Don’t be surprised if someone says, “I don’t know what you’re talking about. Would you please demythologize what you just said.”

I still run with those who want a Jesus-based faith life.
But I’m not content with all the differentiation that has governed so much of my life. It is refreshing and liberating to expand my awareness of potential avenues for integration. One recurring theme for me is the relationship between Christianity and Indigenous religious beliefs and rites.

A timely encounter.
Walking on a sandy beach, I heard a light drum beat and saw a man and woman standing on the shore. As I approached, he stopped drumming and even shifted to hold the small round drum behind his back. It seemed an act of humility to show no offence to me. Respectfully, I asked what they were doing.

Darrell and Barbara are an Indigenous couple, ‘people of the water’ from an oceanside reservation* in northern Washington state. They were having evening prayers as the incoming tide once again revealed the rhythms of Creation. I am glad I went for that walk and felt the freedom to approach them. Our time together became an act of fellowship, prayer, and worship. [*Note – in the U.S.A., native lands are still called ‘reservations.’]

But that is another story. I hope to publish it next week.

Postscript: After finishing this piece, I went to the internet. Not before but after. I wasn’t surprised that many writers have addressed the topic of ‘asking Jesus into your heart.’ My approach to most of what I put on miles2go is to share what I am thinking, what I have experienced and processed, not to give you an executive summary of what is floating in etherspace.

Her name was Merrilee

Posted on April 1, 2026April 3, 2026 by admin

I wish I could find a picture of her. Especially when dressed in her clown costume to do a program with children. She was a woman born deaf but could communicate on levels that surpassed many ‘normal’ hearers. And I believe she was an active agent in saving my life.

It was a good day for flying.

Three other men and I owned a Piper Pacer single-engine plane. In fact, the day of the purchase deal was the same day my wife was giving birth to our firstborn, a son. This was an example (there are many more) of my lack of sensitivity to qualities a loving husband should possess.

My dear wife was in labor in the adjoining room. I was on a nearby phone (a ‘pay phone’ back in those days), handset cord stretched to its limit as I leaned towards her and asked, “Can I buy a share in this plane? Can I?”


It still shames me now to think of the barren state I was in concerning emotional intelligence. Rather than tell me what I deserved to hear at that moment – “Go fly a kite!” – she still exercised undeserving grace in the midst of her discomfort. A few days later, we went home from the hospital with a beautiful son (even though I have always said newborn babies are basically ‘ugly’). And I got to buy my plane.

It sounds so lofty. Me a pilot. My own plane (with three others). The reality was far less exotic. I had my private pilot’s licence but minimal hours of flying. And all that time was in what’s called a tricycle wheel configuration (a Tri-Pacer). A nose wheel put the tail high up in the air to provide the pilot a clear sight directly through the windscreen. And, when applying the brakes upon landing, the plane would push down onto the nose wheel for a comfortable stop.

Whereas the Piper Pacer was a tail-dragger that basically made the pilot look straight up into the sky until enough momentum in takeoff raised the tail wheel. It also had the habit of wanting its tail wheel to flip around to the front while gaining speed to take off. A completely different challenge than the Tri-Pacer.

Yes, it was a good day for flying. And I wanted to practice some crosswind landings.
That is where, instead of landing into the wind, you land with a wind blowing from the side. Which required particular skills to make sure the plane landed pointing forwards. The runway for a crosswind landing that day was quite a bit shorter than the main runway. And it ran straight into a hangar building with a row of planes on each side as you approach the entrance to the hangar.

My first landing was fine. As I came around the circuit for a second landing, I didn’t notice that the wind had shifted and was now behind me. Which meant the wind was pushing me. It would be more difficult to slow down the plane and would take a longer time stopping once landed. I touched down fine near the beginning of the short runway. But that’s when I was in deep trouble.

I can say I was ‘hurtling’ down the runway because I really was. And I couldn’t slam on the brakes as that would cause the dragging tail of the plane to flip right over the front. Sitting up as high as I could to peer through the windscreen, all I could see was a row of planes flashing by on each side of me and the open jaws of a large hangar in front of me.

Merrilee was on her way home from work.
That afternoon, while I was in the sky, she decided to stop at our house to visit with my wife. Their conversation included reference to me being up in the plane. Merrilee, a woman of faith, had a deep conviction to pray for me, especially for my safety. And so they prayed.

Later, after comparing times, we realized that Merrilee and my wife were praying at the moment I was hurtling down the runway towards my sure death. I would run into one of the Ag-Truck planes loaded with fuel and crop-spraying chemicals that lined each side of the runway. Or I would crash headlong into the planes in the open hangar. Either way, there would be a fiery explosion. As an inexperienced pilot, I had no reservoir of automatic skills to draw from.

I can’t say my life went before me in a flash.
It all happened too fast. But just before reaching the hangar, I had a presence of mind to tap the brakes, see a gap after the last plane on the right, and jam the rudder pedal to swing hard right. The plane did a 90-degree turn to the edge of the runway and onto the furrows of the cultivated field next door. It sank into, then bounced out of, one furrow. It attempted to fly again, came down, hit the next furrow and gently flipped with the tail coming over the front. I was hanging upside down, dazed, strapped in by my harness.

A friend came running out of the hangar. Ben was the local funeral director (I know – a bit of irony there). As a pilot himself, he knew that a spark could ignite the plane’s fuel. So Ben quickly switched off the ignition then released my harness. That was my first (and only) experience in life of dropping down suddenly from an upside-down position.

Her name was Merrilee. She was compelled to pray.
At the same time as I was heading towards oblivion with no sense of what to do. Was it ‘the hand of God’ that saved me? Was it a divine Spirit that came over me? I don’t know. And does it really matter? An awareness for action, a presence of mind, came into me to do what I did. And I am still here. 50 years later.

As a Christian, I give thanks to God. And, as a believer in the power of prayer, I also say, “Thank you, Merrilee and Barb.”

Afterword
Not knowing the religious-spiritual-faith orientations of anyone who may read this piece, I am constrained to add a bit of an Addendum here.

To say “I believe in the power of prayer” is not an exclusive belief.
It isn’t just for Christians or other ‘religious’ people. If you can separate it from any biases you may have regarding organized religion, you may even affirm prayer or prayer-like expressions as a universal, inclusive human quality.

The Alcoholics Anonymous 12-Step Program has transformed many lives and been adapted for success in other contexts of society. A core principle is to assume a human connection to a ‘higher power’ that transcends the physical realm of one’s own life. It can be anyone or anything but has to be an entity that takes you out of yourself. If you want to be rather calloused about it, someone has said that it can even be your dog.

The yoga practitioner doing salutations to greet the rising sun at dawn on a Phuket beach. Buddhist monks spinning prayer wheels and offering continuous chants. Hindu rituals on the banks of the Ganges River. Indigenous affirmations towards Creator and Mother Earth. Tibetan prayer flags for the wind to carry positive energy to enrich all creation.

Even the non-religious person who spontaneously utters “Oh my God!” at the sight of a horrific car crash is expressing a prayer. It is a deeply felt cry from one human spirit to others in need. A prayer, a genuine outburst of positive desire for wellbeing in the midst of a tragic life situation.

All of these activities are variations of a common human impulse towards connecting with someone or something above or beyond and outside of ourselves. Recognizing this basic human unction has potential to be a powerful force for learning and growth. It may even influence a life that might otherwise be driven solely by self-directed ego and rationalism.

A Second Afterword
Again, as with other reflections, this piece is growing while waiting to be published on the website. A few days ago, I came across the following newspaper column. It speaks strongly to my above words regarding the universal human unction towards prayer-like activity.

Ken Noskye (1960–2021), an Indigenous freelance journalist, was known for his honest, heartfelt, and humorous storytelling. A member of Sturgeon Lake Cree Nation in northern Alberta, he attended a residential school, suffered lifelong addictions, and spent time in prison.

Even after passing from this life in 2021, Ken’s many readers motivated newspapers to publish his writings again.

The column at left was included in the March 2026 issue of Saskatoon News. Since the small font may be difficult to read, I have repeated most of it below.


The power of prayer has walked me this far in life.
No matter what I faced, I was taught to pray. Whether a person prays in a sweat lodge, church, mosque, synagogue or a temple doesn’t matter. It’s the prayer that matters. I was also taught not only to pray in hard times, but also to pray to give thanks for what I have.

For many years in my younger life, I questioned why I prayed when I felt my prayers weren’t being answered. It was only when I started to clearly see through what has been thrown at me, did I realize it was the power of my prayers that walked me here. These were prayers that came from the heart.

One of my favourite prayers comes from an American Indian chief named Yellow Lark. It came out in 1887. I said this prayer so many times I memorized it:

“Oh, Great Spirit, whose voice I hear in the wind and whose breath gives lite to all the world, hear me. I am small and weak. I need your strength and wisdom. Let me walk in beauty and my eyes ever behold the red and purple sunset. Make my hands respect the things you have made and my ear sharp to hear your voice. Make me wise so that I may understand the things you have taught my people. Let me learn the lessons you have hidden in every leaf and rock.

“I seek strength, not to be superior to my brothers and sisters, but to fight my greatest enemy – myself. Make me always ready to come to you with clean hands and straight eyes, so when life fades, as the fading sunset, my spirit will come to you without shame.”

This prayer isn’t a secret to many First Nations people. I’ve been to many meetings, gatherings and ceremonies where this prayer opens each event. One of the interesting things about First Nations prayers is many are not written down or recorded. Many are memorized and passed from one generation to the next.

It’s been the power of prayer that has walked me this far in life and it will be that prayer my Creator will hear and take me home.

— Ken Noskye

Mark and Crystal

Posted on March 4, 2026March 4, 2026 by admin

It’s a pleasant Sunday morning in September, a year into the COVID-19 pandemic, and I’m heading to church. A contemporary service that meets in an old theatre on a downtown street found in every city. You know the one. The street where ‘less-than-desirable-to-meet’ people tend to hang out.

I was about to walk past this young man and woman when I remembered the biblical Good Samaritan story (Luke 10.25-37). A man robbed, stripped, beaten, and left to die was denied any attention from both the spiritual (priest) and organizational (Levite) gatekeepers of Jewish worship. The priest and Levite both “passed by on the other side.”


You and I may be able to relate to that behaviour. Have we ever been tempted to cross the street to avoid someone who is coming towards us?

Preachers vary in their treatment of these two men in the parable. [Of course they were men – if women, they probably would have stopped]. Some say they were late for ‘church,’ others point out hypocrisy between theory and practice in those who espouse religion. And, of course, maybe it really doesn’t matter what their story was. The focus of Jesus’ parable seems to be not on what they did NOT do but rather on what the Samaritan DID do.

I must make it clear that by no means did all this go through my head as I approached the young man and women on the sidewalk. It wasn’t shaping up to be a case of which parable character I was about to emulate. I just wanted to have a conversation with two people who appeared to be rather comfortable in a somewhat uncomfortable setting. They weren’t looking too bad despite being tucked into the alcove of a building entrance without a blanket on the hard and rather cold concrete sidewalk.

It struck me how Mark was sitting with such a nurturing posture. His arms were comfortably surrounding Crystal with warmth and security. It reminded me of Jesus tenderly holding a lamb.

If you can, enlarge the picture to see Mark and Crystal’s eyes. [Always look at the eyes; they are a window to the soul]. Both have that look of pain from a life that has not gone the way they might wish. But there is also a glimmer of light. I think that glimmer comes from having genuine human companionship even on a hard concrete sidewalk.


A human connection that helps to transcend the harsh realities of a present situation. And even suggests hope that there is potential for life making sense again.

Mark was concerned that I would not think they were panhandling. It was important for him to assure me that he had jobs with painting and moving companies. I didn’t press for more information from either of them. I was glad that they wanted me to think more highly of them rather than less. After a pleasant conversation, I asked Mark if I could buy them something to eat and gave him $20. They consented to a picture and I carried on to church.

In her book, The last human job: The work of connecting in a disconnected world (2024), Allison Pugh calls us back to being a society that “relies on empathy, the spontaneity of human contact, and a mutual recognition of each other’s humanity.” It is quite a provocative title to suggest that to be human is the ‘last’ human job. As artificial intelligence (AI) rapidly develops, a lot more attention is being given to the issue of what is left to be human.

I wonder if that is what Jesus was getting at. What do we see when we look at another person? The priest and Levite saw a potential intrusion to the plans for their day. An undesirable annoyance to be avoided. The Samaritan saw something else. A human being in need who deserved dignity and respect regardless of the circumstances. Regardless how busy he was. Regardless how much it might cost him. Regardless that he may be crossing racial or cultural taboos to even touch the bloodied man. He broke through all of those concerns in a genuinely human manner that put the self-righteous Jews to shame.

Religious people aspire towards righteousness. That includes seeking justice, personal virtue, and a right standing with their God. All good things. The priest and Levite sincerely wanted to fulfil a high-level code of belief and behaviour. The problem was one of focus. Their desire for righteousness got lost in the daily practice of self-righteousness. They lost sight of what Allison Pugh calls ‘the last human job.’ Empathy. Spontaneity of human contact. Mutual recognition of one’s own and another’s humanity.

The priest and Levite needed a refresher course in truths conveyed by the powerful images in both of the above pictures. When I look at Crystal, I see the little lamb sheltered in the arms of Jesus. And, in Mark’s eyes and smile, I see the joy of knowing he is making a difference in someone’s life. Images that the Samaritan would grasp intuitively even as an outsider to all the systems that were supposed to nurture such qualities.

Repenting of Religion

Posted on February 18, 2026February 20, 2026 by admin

Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a Lutheran pastor and theologian in Germany, was killed by the Nazi regime just weeks before liberation of the prison camp by Allied troops. In his relatively brief life, Bonhoeffer set out a path for what he called ‘religionless Christianity.’

It was a call to reject ‘religiosity’ and embrace a living and active faith that includes the whole person and affects every aspect of life.

In Repenting of Religion (Baker Books, 2004), Boyd uses Bonhoeffer’s ideas as a challenge to begin practicing a ‘faith-life’ based in love rather than a ‘religious-life’ based on prescriptive doctrines and practices.

From this perspective, he says, “The practice of judgment should be foreign to Christian character.”

If your viewing lens is conservative Christianity, as was mine for most of my life, the following clippings from Boyd’s book should get your attention:

The pharisees of our day will be offended. The church that loves as God loves has to be willing to have their reckless love scorned as compromising, relativistic, liberal, soft on doctrine, anti-religious.

After all, what kind of church attracts and embraces prostitutes, drunkards, gays, and drug addicts? What kind of church routinely has smokers, drinkers, gamblers, and bums ushering during their services, hanging out in their small groups, singing in their choir, signing up for classes, volunteering for ministry and so forth – without anyone immediately confronting their sin? . . . What kind of church blurs the boundary between those who are ‘in’ and those who are ‘out’ to this degree?
The answer, I submit, is a Jesus kind of church.

To love like this, a community has to freed from an obsession with its perimeter – its ability to know or decide who is ‘in’ and who is ‘out.’ It has to be okay with wheat and tares growing alongside each other.
It has to be willing to live in total ambiguity as to who is in and who is out.
It has to live from the center not the perimeter, from the core not the edges.

So, I now either have your attention or you are already gone. Track with me as I summarize the flow of Boyd’s explanation for what gradually went wrong with the Church. He takes it back to Genesis and the Garden of Eden.

When naked and not ashamed, Adam and Eve were free to wander with no restraint other than “Don’t touch the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil!” They ate from all the Garden’s fruit including the Tree of Life which provided for a totally fulfilling relationship with each other and with God. The best way to define this relationship was Love.

It is reasonable to ask, “Why not eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil?” A simple answer is that they didn’t need to know how to make judgments based on perceived goods and evils. As long as they were totally nurtured by the Tree of Life, such judgments were unnecessary. Everything was screened through the perfect lens of Love. All of that changed, however, with one bite from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Now Adam and Eve are still naked but ashamed. The fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil has given them the ability to make judgments. And God has a problem. He can no longer allow them to eat from the Tree of Life. In the words of Genesis, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever” (3.22).

This new ability to distinguish between good and evil is now the core of their identity. Adam and Eve have separated themselves from relationship with their Creator. [They may not be getting along too well with each other either]. To eat from the Tree of Life and add eternal life to the mix would make them like God but driven by judgment and not love. Another way of putting it is that love doesn’t need judgment but judgment without love is devastating.

Fast forward to today. This ability to judge prevents us, in ourselves, from fulfilling what we were created to be and do, namely to live in loving relationship with God and others. We have displaced God and moved ourselves into the center. And now we ascribe relative value to things and people based on our human judgments of them as being good or not good in our sight. We draw life from the ‘rightness’ of our beliefs and the ‘correctness’ of our behaviour, and judge others accordingly.

You may ask, “So are we trapped in this dilemma?” Is the fulness of what the Tree of Life offered no longer available? Well, in Christian theology, Jesus is the new Tree of Life as represented on the Cross. He becomes the instrument for raising his followers above the limitations of judgment and restoring them to relationships with love in the center. As the new Tree of Life, he supersedes the dehumanizing power of the other Tree. In Christ we become truly and fully human again.

After an extensive biblical study to document his perspective on judgment and love, Boyd shifts to practical implications of the Church’s need to ‘repent from religion.’

With a no-holds-barred approach, he takes on gluttony and homosexuality. In Jewish culture, not controlling your food appetite was viewed on par with not controlling sexual appetite; both were labeled as “shameless passions.” Boyd wonders, “Why isn’t the sin of gluttony portrayed as the sin that makes America a modern Sodom and Gomorrah?” Yet in conservative evangelical churches, “No one questions the genuineness of the faith of overweight people.” They are generally welcomed into church fellowship without any suspicion – even obese pastors! He asks, “Why is this same gracious mindset not extended to gays?” On the contrary, the mindset of most conservative Christians is that the sin of homosexuality is a deal breaker. It defines who is ‘in’ and who is ‘out.’ The genuineness of their faith is more often questioned or even denied.

For Boyd, the essence of life is not found in correct doctrine or pious behaviour. As important as these qualities are, to base life on these things is religion. The community of faith needs to ask forgiveness from God, and from the world, for being religious. We have eaten from the forbidden tree and constructed our own self-serving sin list to determine who’s ‘in’ and who’s ‘out.’ Instead, we are called to turn from our religion of addiction to the tree of knowledge of good and evil. We are called to repent of placing our self-perceived judgments about ‘rightness’ above the command to love.

Repentance (a decision to turn) is the first evidence that we have stopped eating from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and, through the Cross of Jesus Christ, have begun eating from the Tree of Life. In other words, we can be restored to God’s original intention of true life and fellowship with Him, with Creation, and with each other.

On ‘Repenting of Religion’

Posted on February 18, 2026February 20, 2026 by admin

Note: This piece is an extension of the material in ‘Repenting of Religion.’ You may want to start there. (see My Bookshelf).

In his book, Repenting of Religion, Greg Boyd tees up against the deficiencies of organized religion. As a successful pastor, he is obviously trying to build the Church and local community of faith in positive ways. But he definitely does not want to be ‘an emperor with no clothes.’ Hopefully, Boyd’s pastoral practice is consistent with his theological theorizing.

I suspect most Christians assume Jesus wanted his followers to keep it simple rather than complicated. Here may be a new extension for K.I.S.S. – Keep It Simple, Simon. (i.e., Simon Peter was the initial leader of the Jesus movement). Yet organizations seem to inevitably drift from simple to complex. It is somewhat like a vicious circle: “A sequence of reciprocal cause and effect in which two or more elements intensify and aggravate each other, leading inexorably to a worsening of the situation.”

The early church grew exponentially. Policy guidelines, leadership structures, S.O.P.s (standard operating procedures) were quickly needed to bring some semblance of order. Keep in mind that ‘policy’ and ‘police’ come from the same root word. Early apostolic letters (e.g., to the Corinthian church) already were preoccupied with trying to minimize the chaos of everybody doing whatever they felt like in the moment.

Within the first 100 years, increasingly complex hierarchies of bishops were established and dominant in ruling the life of the Church. And, to provide guidance and authority for governance, these leaders developed an extensive body of documentation. With every new twist in the road of church history, it seems like there was another binder of detail for description, interpretation, and prescription. And the church ‘Fathers’ held court over it all. [It’s interesting that, for all its reverence for Mary, the best the organized Church could do was put leadership in the hands of ‘Fathers’].

Therein lies Boyd’s complaint. The Spirit moves. The Church begins. Creeds creep in to corral any signs of an unbridled Spirit. The Spirit recedes. The smothering attributes of organized religion reign without restraint. Did Jesus know this would happen? Is that why, in the final hours with his disciples, he pleads for them to live life through the lens of love (John 14-17)? If so, given the history of how the Church ‘developed,’ he certainly surpassed John the Baptist in being ‘a voice in the wilderness.’

And therein lies Boyd’s own cry in the wilderness. In our understandings and practices as a faith community, we must move from a state of judgment to a state of love. (At some point it will be necessary to introduce the word ‘grace’). The first step in this movement is to lay down our arms, to disarm ourselves from our self-proclaimed instruments of righteousness. We must stop pretending to be God. Or acting like He needs to be defended by our puny selves. Isn’t it kind of ludicrous to assume that God needs us to defend Him? But, in the name of keeping the faith ‘pure’ or ‘holy’ or whatever, we continue to make pronouncements about the relative value, purity, or godliness of other people.

I totally resonate with Boyd’s cry: “If we are led by love and by the Spirit of God, there will be times when we are called not only to refrain from judgment but to incarnate ourselves in another person’s story to gain understanding and promote healing in his or her life.” Wow! Isn’t that powerful? To move past judgment and accept that only God knows the full story of that person’s life. And our primary calling and role is to be an agent of love.

I have two examples to illustrate what this is all about. One is a local church dealing with lifestyle habits in two of its attendees. The other is a Christian family dealing with a child who ‘comes out’ as transgender.

The leadership board of a small church was called upon to administer church discipline in two situations. First was a woman who had been a Christian and church member for many years. Second was a new believer and attendee, a biker who smoked, probably drank liquor (maybe did other drugs), had several tattoos, and sported the leather and hair that are usually associated with bikers. Both were being ‘judged’ for lifestyle issues.

I must admit that I was fascinated with the actions taken by the board. For the woman, they were firm but loving in counseling her with the necessity of changing her ways. As a long-term Christian active in fellowship with that local community of faith, and fully desirous of continuing, she had a responsibility to be and to do better. Yet for the biker, the board told the congregation to ‘lay off’ him. Give him space and time to figure out what the Spirit wants him to keep and change in his life. Wow! Now that stirs my soul with joy! That is Spirit-empowered, godly discernment that is channeled through the lens of love rather than judgment.

My second example. Stay with me as I must give enough detail to show how it exemplifies everything that Boyd is calling for in his book.

Both husband and wife were ‘lifers’ in conservative evangelicalism. [They are both gone now]. She was a teacher in Christian schools. He was a pastor then faculty and administrator in a very conservative Christian college. Rock solid people. Totally committed to their faith and to the Church. Shortly after they retired, their son came to them and said, “Mom and Dad, I have always felt I was a girl in a boy’s body.”

Holy moly! What do you do with that!? I didn’t witness the beginning of their journey after receiving this news. So I don’t know what shades of hurt, anger, etc. they may have processed. But soon thereafter, I sat in their living room as they, with tears, shared how they could only love their now self-declared daughter. I could not see a shred of judgment in their words or actions. In fact, at one point, when the mother automatically still referred to their child as “he,” the father gently interjected with “she.” Their son had been socially reclusive all his life. Yet when we came to visit the parents, he (she) also wanted to see us. The next day we met for coffee. So much went through my mind and emotions as we sat with this newly-confident, well dressed young person now presenting as a woman.

This story is quite personal to me as I worked at the same college/seminary with the father for 20 years. And I would have never guessed that he could move so ‘naturally’ from the well-defined rigours of serving conservative evangelicalism to a selfless love that transcended all judgments.

It is quite reasonable for you (and me) to ask at this point: “How then, if all are accepted just as they are, do we as Christians then grow in holiness, in conformity to the image of Christ?” Back to you (and me) is the question: “Do we trust God to do His work in a person?” Our challenge is to grow in our faith life not by social pressure and institutional judgments. Rather, we must trust the work of the Holy Spirit, the Word of God taught and modeled by leaders, and the sharing of life together with others in loving relationships.

Many of us look back to the early church as a model for genuine fellowship and mutual accountability. We want that now but have trouble making it work in the larger, organized structures and expectations of churches today. For Boyd, confession of needs and accountability for change can only happen well in small group settings. Herein lies a strong argument for churches of all sizes to cultivate as many smaller cells as they can. Building genuine relationships is the key to cultivate love as the center and to leave judgments on the perimeter.

And, just in case you (or I) still wonder if God needs our constant vigilance of judgments to help and defend Him, let’s end with how He feels about it: “Behold, I am the Lord, the God of all mankind. Is anything too hard for me?” (Jeremiah 32.27)

I Need Your Tears

Posted on May 15, 2024January 23, 2026 by admin

I have a friend. Actually, two of them. They have both ‘been there’ for me. Even through the years when I didn’t deserve to have a friend. I was too busy. Too much into my own agenda of life. Too self-contained, not even aware of how barren I was.

They are very different but equally precious. From one of them I receive the gift of his tears. So often, while I was sharing something that I could not express easily, he would sigh, lower his head, and softly shed tears. There was something healing in those tears. I drew strength from them. They didn’t come with words of trite summary, declarations of intervention, or any other attempt to put things back together quickly for me. He was just there, at times simply saying, “Oh, Ron. . .” as his heart reached out to touch my spirit and lift me up. I needed those tears. As I have moved out of the vortex of my working life, I realize that I still need them.

But now, I am aware that he also needs mine. After being in different locations for several months, this morning we met at our favourite coffee place – the A & W on 8th Street. Early in our conversation, he raised several life issues that he was thinking about. I realized that, this time, it wasn’t all about me. I couldn’t expect those usual gentle questions that probed into how everything was going in my life. Today, I wouldn’t be drawn into deeper levels of sharing that prompted his sigh, a shaking of his head, and a soft expression of tears. He needed me to listen. To care. It was as if he had been waiting for us to see each other again so he could share some of what was pressing on his mind.

I confess that I am not wired for autopilot to respond the way he always did. Until recent years, I didn’t shed too many tears. But today, I realized that, for the moment at least, ‘the shoe was on the other foot’ and my friend needed me. There weren’t any crisis matters that called for a strong emotional response. It was just an opportunity for me to tune in, set self aside, and listen. That shouldn’t be a difficult task. Especially when we are with someone we care for and want to ‘be there’ for. Yet, for some of us, it does not come naturally and we have to work at it. For most of my life, I have been one of those people.

Much has been written about tears. Some studies say that, on average, women cry about once a week and men about once a month. Research also suggests that it is good to cry. Our tears make us feel better because they contain stress hormones. So we are literally shedding stress. Interviewed by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation radio program Tapestry, Brooklyn (New York) minister Benjamin Perry says that “letting yourself weep can help you lead an emotionally authentic life.”

Religion, philosophies of life, and history also weigh in on the matter. For Christians, it is significant that Jesus wept when approaching the tomb of his friend Lazarus (John 11.35). And Psalm 56.8 suggests that God either records our tears in a scroll or stores them in a bottle. Buddhists affirm that Buddha wants us to remember our tears as a motivation for practice and a vehicle for nurturing our growth and meaningful turning points in life. Historians track how Medieval attitudes, Enlightenment emphases, and Victorian restrictions all contributed to the demeaning of tears.

And so, I need my tears. You need your tears. And we need each other’s tears.

Benjamin Perry book: Cry, Baby: Why Our Tears Matter. Link to article based on Tapestry interview: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/tapestry/crying-weeping-benjamin-perry-1.6886589.

Oh What a Beautiful Morning

Posted on April 29, 2024February 14, 2026 by admin

Today was so special. I had one of my regular coffee hours with a close friend at our favourite A and W. We are both glad they still receive old coupons for some time after expiry. I made another stop on 8th Street then pulled into Sobey’s to pick up a few things. Not realizing that, at the checkout, I would have an inspiring conversation that reminds me how every day can have a beautiful morning.

At the checkout, I met Hina (pronounced Hee-na). She was born in Pakistan, grew up in Saudi Arabia, and migrated to Canada. Hina was so friendly and open to conversation that I felt free to ask her a few more questions. She shared how oppressive life was for women in both of those countries. And how thankful she was to be in Canada where she has a freedom she never had there.

With a growing sense of mutual comfort, I asked if Hina grew up in the Islamic faith. She confirmed that she did then spontaneously went on to tell me about a book she read by an American pastor. When she said, ‘The Purpose-Driven Life,’ I had a bit of a shock. This was a book written by Rick Warren, the evangelical pastor of Saddleback Community Church in California. A book that deals with generic human and life issues but is clearly based in an evangelical Christian perspective. With no one waiting in line at the moment, Hina was quite animated in sharing how valuable that book was for her. And how she could see so many compatible beliefs between Islam and Christianity.

Wow! This was something I was not expecting. A vibrant Islamic woman instructing me about the valuable material in Warren’s book. I told her I was a Christian but, for some reason, felt compelled to add that the extreme right-wing evangelicals in the United States did not represent my Christianity. With a broad smile, Hina shared a few more comments on the healthy, wholesome beliefs and values that should define our respective faiths. And, again, how compatible she thought those core values are.

I was so grateful for our brief but powerful conversation. And even more thankful as I write these words. It was a moment of connection between two people who came from different worlds, still functioned out of different religious systems, but mutually had a sense of the elements of faith that must be the foundation for whatever structure we build to make sense of life and living.

Someone was now coming to the checkout counter. I picked up my two bags and, without thinking, said, “Bless you.” With a smile, Hina said something in return that I couldn’t hear. But I kind of think that she was blessing me as well.

I Surprised Myself

Posted on April 28, 2024February 14, 2026 by admin

This morning I took a risk. I surprised myself. And I’m glad I did.

For this narrative I must give you a bit of backstory. All my life I have not shared any food. No arms entwined with my loved one to feed a forkful of meat or vegetables from each other’s plate. No taste of a drink or sip of a milk shake. No giving my child a lick of my ice cream cone. Even if it is my favourite flavour. You want a lick, you can have the whole cone. I think you get the picture. So now my story from this morning.

I have gone to the 8 a.m. Sunday service at St. John’s Anglican Cathedral several times. Usually there were 20+ people in attendance at this early service. Today I was one of 5 plus the priest and the on-duty deacon. All times previous, I have slipped out quietly (other than when I tripped on the step going down to the exit door) and avoided participating in the Communion service. It was an escape motivated by fear. Even medical pamphlets on display during the intense COVID years weren’t enough to keep me there.

What was I afraid of? The act of sharing the wine from a common cup (actually a finely-crafted goblet). The individual wafers were fine. Straight from the hand of the priest onto the palm of the penitent’s hand. Not at all threatening like each person plunging their hand into a large loaf of bread and ripping out a chunk. But the common cup was too much. I read the pamphlet with research data intended to encourage me to participate. It affirmed that my fear of bacterial, viral, or any other contaminant was not based in fact. I had more danger of getting sick from sliding my hand along the pew railing and sticking my finger in my mouth.

So, today, why didn’t I get up and run? As I looked around at the other people in attendance, something happened inside. The widow limping up the aisle to place the collection plate on the altar. The bearded middle-aged man, in dress suit, fulfilling his duties as the active deacon, reading the Scripture passages with clarity and conviction as if to 100s rather than just the faithful 5. The elderly couple – now that I am almost 76, by ‘elderly’ I mean in their late 80s – who were clearly sitting in their ‘reserved’ spot every week. Whose left? Another single person near the front. And yes, there was also the pianist at the piano, a newer addition to Anglican worship.

Perhaps the ‘icing on the cake’ to entice me to stay rather than flee was the priest herself. She cast me a welcoming smile when I entered the sanctuary five minutes late and purposefully sat well behind everyone else. Her sermon focused on Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch who, when given insights by Philip, said, “Here is water, what prevents me from being baptized?” With more contemporary points of reference, she teased out the question, “What prevents us?” from loving God and showing love for one another. A sermon only 10 minutes in length and read from a manuscript. Yet the priest’s passion for the subject at hand, and her increasing connection visually with each of her listeners, drew me into the landscape she was painting.

By the time it was all over and the tiny group was heading to the front for Communion, I realized that I was an integral member of an organic micro-community gathered in that place at that time. We were pilgrims sharing a common journey even though none of them knew me and I knew none of them personally.

And so, as I answered the question, “What prevents me?” from participating, I realized that I wanted to and must do so. Forgetting my fear for a moment, I lined up with the other 5. The deacon was serving the wine after the priest served the wafers. Never having previously taken Communion in an Anglican church, I watched the 5 to see when they ate the wafer and didn’t quite get the timing right. But no one was assessing my performance so I was okay.

Then the deacon approached with extended cup, looking kindly into my eyes and reciting the appropriate words. I was second in line so just one set of lips were on the cup before me. Other than I think he and the priest may have taken their sip while preparing everything at the altar. He wiped the rim of the cup and shifted it a quarter-turn so my lips would touch a new spot. I looked at him, looked inside the cup, and saw that it was white wine not red. I don’t know why I expected it to be red – well, I guess I do know. As I looked at him, and he looked at me, I realized this had the makings of what I have heard is called a ‘Mexican standoff.’

A lot can go through a mind in a few moments. I relived all my fears. I reviewed my new fellowship of humanity with the 5. I revered the devotion of the priest and deacon. And within that few moments, I recanted my fear, took hold of the cup, and sipped. He moved on to number 3. I looked around at the beautiful cathedral and realized what I had done.

As I write these words, I have a fresh sense of what was a significant moment of release, of inclusion, and of expression in my life this morning. They received me without question. And I was finally able to come alongside them without reservation. I am blessed. And a better person for it. At least until I am hit with another fear or bias in a new incident of life.

New Beginnings

Posted on April 2, 2024January 23, 2026 by admin

March 31, 2024

Easter Sunday. The foundational creative event that launched the Christian Church. Seems like an appropriate moment to start something new in my own life. Writing. Pinning down some of the multi-directional thoughts that my mind spills out on any given day. Not just my mind. My emotions. And my spirit. Something inside that is corollary to mind and emotion, that runs deeper, eschewing guidance from rails or worn paths, flowing across thoughts and feelings with an invitation to ‘come and let us learn and launch out together.’

I confess to being a bit fearful. I really don’t know where I am going in all of this. I have spent much time building and maintaining boxes to provide separate living quarters for these elements. I largely viewed them as competitors fighting for time and space as I naively searched my way through life. And I was committed to the pre-eminence of mind. Everything had to ‘make sense’ or it wasn’t worthwhile. Yet, in more recent years, I find myself responding with deep feelings to an awareness, an event, a situation. These emotional expressions can so easily be just a puff of wind into a prevailing breeze. But, if companioned to the expansive realms of spirit, they can provide fuel for an ever-increasing global awareness of true and new realities.

So, back to Easter Sunday. I don’t presume your personal posture as participating in a Christian worldview. I respect your paradigm for making sense of all the variables of life and living. But allow me to wrap this monologue with reference to Jesus Christ on Easter Sunday. He ended what he had begun by laying out and laying down everything associated with the full life. With mind he could say, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” With soul (emotion) – “My God, why have you forsaken me?” Then, “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit” and “It is finished” – and with this last breath, he released his body from the constraints of earthly mind, emotion and spirit.

And now, I am back to ‘mind.’ I have so many thoughts jumping for attention. I feel like a popcorn machine in a movie theatre. Yet there is a sense of joy and anticipation in my spirit as I look forward to more writing. As I use this platform to process my own life, I hope to stimulate reciprocal reflections in you. The Na’vi people in the movie Avatar say, “I see you.” If we meet, if we are already friends, may you and I ‘see’ each other through this common experience of life and living.

©2026 Miles 2 Go